2025 – Re-opener of some CBA articles underway
As of April 1, the District and CSEA Chapter 250 have begun the annual process of re-opening a maximum of two articles each.
CSEA Chapter 250 has requested to amend their initial re-opener proposal to include salary discussions for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. The District has chosen not to re-open any additional articles. Negotiation meetings have yet to be scheduled and are pending an April 23 public hearing.
Q. Can you clarify the purpose of the Market Study?
A. The purpose of the Market Study was to ensure our salary schedules and individual positions were competitive compared to others in our sector of the economy. In the bargaining unit, salary adjustments varied for positions depending on the results of this third party study of the District's salary schedules. Not every bargaining unit member or position received the same salary adjustment. Those adjustments were based on the many different job titles in the unit and what the study's findings were for each of those positions. The outcomes of the Market Study remain available on the District's web page under the Human Resources/Salaries link.
Q. What is the Unfair Practice Charge SA-CE-3134-E?
A. As of July 2024, CSEA has withdrawn this charge.
The District and Chapter 250 had a hearing scheduled for July 9-11, 2024 related to an unfair practice charge filed by Chapter 250 concerning interpretation of the prior contract's "Me Too" provision and a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by Chapter 250 in May 2021. At the time, CSEA 250 was the only exclusive representative of District employees. Both sides will have an opportunity to question witnesses and present evidence regarding the issues raised in the complaint. An administrative law judge will make a proposed decision after considering all the evidence presented.